深度学习在知识图谱构建及推理中的应用

doi:10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2408-0280

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 知识图谱作为自然语言处理领域的一种结构化知识表示形式，能够描述现实世界中的概念及相互关系，常被应用于信息检索、数据管理等领域。深度学习因其具有自动学习多元数据内在规律和表示层次的特性，可用于大规模、高质量知识图谱的精准构建及有效推理，已逐渐成为新兴研究热点。为进一步促进深度学习和知识图谱的技术融合，以知识图谱构建及推理过程为主线，全面介绍深度学习在知识表示、知识抽取、知识融合、知识推理领域的相关理论及最新研究成果；同时，根据近年来的研究趋势，重点归纳与总结了适用于图数据特征推理的图深度学习与知识推理相融合的最新研究成果。最后，对深度学习和知识图谱的融合发展做了概要总结和技术展望，为未来研究发展提供参考和思路。

关键词: 知识图谱, 深度学习, 知识图谱构建, 知识推理, 图深度学习

Abstract: Knowledge graphs, as a structured form of knowledge representation in the field of natural language processing, can describe concepts and their relationships in the real world, and is often used in information retrieval, data management, and other fields. Deep learning has gradually become an emerging research hotspot due to its ability to automatically learn the underlying patterns and hierarchical representations from diverse data, which can be used for precise construction and effective reasoning of large-scale, high-quality knowledge graphs. To further promote the technological integration of deep learning and knowledge graphs, this paper focuses on the construction and reasoning processes of knowledge graphs, providing a comprehensive introduction to the relevant theories and latest research achievements in the fields of knowledge representation, knowledge extraction, knowledge fusion, and knowledge reasoning using deep learning. At the same time, according to the research trend in recent years, the paper highlights and summarizes the latest research results on the integration of graph deep learning and knowledge reasoning applicable to graph data feature inference. Finally, an overview and technical outlook are made on the integration and development of deep learning and knowledge graphs, providing reference and ideas for future research directions.

Key words: knowledge graph, deep learning, knowledge graph construction, knowledge reasoning, graph deep learning

孙宇, 刘川, 周扬. 深度学习在知识图谱构建及推理中的应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2025, 61(6): 36-52.

SUN Yu, LIU Chuan, ZHOU Yang. Applications of Deep Learning in Knowledge Graph Construction and Reasoning[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2025, 61(6): 36-52.

参考文献

[1] MIA M T, FERDUS M Z, RAHAT M A R, et al. A comprehensive review of text mining approaches for predicting human behavior using deep learning method[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 2024, 6(1): 170-178.
[2] WU X, DUAN J, PAN Y, et al. Medical knowledge graph: data sources, construction, reasoning, and applications[J]. Big Data Mining and Analytics, 2023, 6(2): 201-217.
[3] JI S X, PAN S R, CAMBRIA E, et al. A survey on knowledge graphs: representation, acquisition, and applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022, 33(2): 494-514.
[4] LIANG K, MENG L Y, LIU M, et al. Learn from relational correlations and periodic events for temporal knowledge graph reasoning[C]//Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2023: 1559-1568.
[5] SHI J H, ZHOU Y Z, WANG Q H, et al. Collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm based on knowledge graph representation learning[C]//Proceedings of Innovative Computing 2024. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2024: 146-156.
[6] WANG Y, LIPKA N, ROSSI R A, et al. Knowledge graph prompting for multi-document question answering[C]//Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. New York: ACM, 2024: 19206-19214.
[7] LECUN Y, BOTTOU L, BENGIO Y, et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1998, 86(11): 2278-2324.
[8] MIKOLOV T, KARAFIáT M, BURGET L, et al. Recurrent neural network based language model[C]//Proceedings of the Interspeech 2010, 2010: 1045-1048.
[9] KIPF T N, WELLING M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017: 1915-1922.
[10] PENG C Y, XIA F, NASERIPARSA M, et al. Knowledge graphs: opportunities and challenges[J]. arXiv:2303.13948, 2023.
[11] WANG F, ZHENG Z, ZHANG Y J, et al. To see further: knowledge graph-aware deep graph convolutional network for recommender systems[J]. Information Sciences, 2023, 647: 119465.
[12] WANG X Y, EL-GOHARY N. Deep learning-based relation extraction and knowledge graph-based representation of construction safety requirements[J]. Automation in Construction, 2023, 147: 104696.
[13] AL-MOSLMI T, GALLOFRé OCA?A M, L OPDAHL A, et al. Named entity extraction for knowledge graphs: a literature overview[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 32862-32881.
[14] 陈囿任, 李勇, 温明, 等. 多模态知识图谱融合技术研究综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2024, 60(13): 36-50.
CHEN Y R, LI Y, WEN M, et al. Research and comprehensive review on multi-modal knowledge graph fusion techniques[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2024, 60(13): 36-50.
[15] ZHANG X, ZHANG C X, GUO J T, et al. Graph attention network with dynamic representation of relations for knowledge graph completion[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 219: 119616.
[16] 桂梁, 徐遥, 何世柱, 等. 基于动态邻居选择的知识图谱事实错误检测方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (理学版), 2024, 59(7): 76-84.
GUI L, XU Y, HE S Z, et al. Factual error detection in knowledge graphs based on dynamic neighbor selection[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Natural Science), 2024, 59(7): 76-84.
[17] 张西硕, 柳林, 王海龙, 等. 知识图谱中实体关系抽取方法研究[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2024, 18(3): 574-596.
ZHANG X S, LIU L, WANG H L, et al. Survey of entity relationship extraction methods in knowledge graphs[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2024, 18(3): 574-596.
[18] CHEN M, ZHANG Y, KOU X, et al. R-GAT: relational graph attention network for multi-relational graphs[J]. arXiv: 2109. 05922, 2021.
[19] YANG Y H, HUANG C, XIA L H, et al. Knowledge graph contrastive learning for recommendation[C]//Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2022: 1434-1443.
[20] JU W, GU Y, LUO X, et al. Unsupervised graph-level representation learning with hierarchical contrasts[J]. Neural Networks: Official Journal of International Neural Network Society, 2022, 158: 359-368.
[21] SHEN Y H, JIANG X H, LI Z J, et al. UniSKGRep: a unified representation learning framework of social network and knowledge graph[J]. Neural Networks, 2023, 158: 142-153.
[22] WENG H, CHEN J L, OU A H, et al. Leveraging representation learning for the construction and application of a knowledge graph for traditional Chinese medicine: framework development study[J]. JMIR Medical Informatics, 2022, 10(9): e38414.
[23] SUN Z, DING C, FAN J. Lovász principle for unsupervised graph representation learning[C]//Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023: 58290-58311.
[24] ZHANG M, LI P, XIA Y, et al. Labeling trick: a theory of using graph neural networks for multi-node representation learning[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021: 9061-9073.
[25] LI N, SHEN Q, SONG R, et al. MEduKG: a deep-learning-based approach for multi-modal educational knowledge graph construction[J]. Information, 2022, 13(2): 91.
[26] YASUNAGA M, BOSSELUT A, REN H Y, et al. Deep bidirectional language-knowledge graph pretraining[C]//Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. New York: ACM, 2022: 37309-37323.
[27] LIANG M Y, DU J P, LIANG Z Y, et al. Self-supervised multi-modal knowledge graph contrastive hashing for cross-modal search[C]//Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. New York: ACM, 2024: 13744-13753.
[28] YAO H, ZHANG C, WEI Y, et al. Graph few-shot learning via knowledge transfer[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 6656-6663.
[29] LI H Y, NI Y, ZENG A, et al. Prior-guided transfer learning for enhancing item representation in e-commerce[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2022: 12387-12395.
[30] LI Q, WANG D L, FENG S, et al. OERL: enhanced representation learning via open knowledge graphs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2023, 35(9): 8880-8892.
[31] DAI Q Y, WU X M, XIAO J R, et al. Graph transfer learning via adversarial domain adaptation with graph convolution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2022, 35(5): 4908-4922.
[32] LI X, LIAN D, LU Z, et al. GraphAdapter: tuning vision-language models with dual knowledge graph[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024.
[33] 姜磊, 刘琦, 赵肄江, 等. 面向知识图谱的信息抽取技术综述[J]. 计算机系统应用, 2022, 31(7): 46-54.
JIANG L, LIU Q, ZHAO Y J, et al. Review on information extraction techniques for knowledge graph[J]. Computer Systems & Applications, 2022, 31(7): 46-54.
[34] 张仰森, 刘帅康, 刘洋, 等. 基于深度学习的实体关系联合抽取研究综述[J]. 电子学报, 2023, 51(4): 1093-1116.
ZHANG Y S, LIU S K, LIU Y, et al. Joint extraction of entities and relations based on deep learning: a survey[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2023, 51(4): 1093-1116.
[35] COLLOBERT R, WESTON J, BOTTOU L, et al. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2011, 12: 2493-2537.
[36] MOQURRAB S A, AYUB U, ANJUM A, et al. An accurate deep learning model for clinical entity recognition from clinical notes[J]. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2021, 25(10): 3804-3811.
[37] SHANG F J, RAN C F. An entity recognition model based on deep learning fusion of text feature[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2022, 59(2): 102841.
[38] LEI X Y, SONG W J, FAN R Y, et al. Semi-supervised geological disasters named entity recognition using few labeled data[J]. GeoInformatica, 2023, 27(2): 263-288.
[39] WANG L, JIANG J C, SONG J W, et al. A weakly-supervised method for named entity recognition of agricultural knowledge graph[J]. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 2023, 37(1): 833-848.
[40] QU X Y, ZENG J, LIU D Z, et al. Distantly-supervised named entity recognition with adaptive teacher learning and fine-grained student ensemble[C]//Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Fifth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Thirteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. New York: ACM, 2023: 13501-13509.
[41] GOYAL A, GUPTA V, KUMAR M. Deep learning-based named entity recognition system using hybrid embedding[J]. Cybernetics and Systems, 2024, 55(2): 279-301.
[42] FANG Y H, ZHANG D J, WU G X. Toward establishing a knowledge graph for drought disaster based on ontology design and named entity recognition[J]. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2023, 25(4): 1457-1470.
[43] LIU P P, WANG G S, LI H, et al. Multi-granularity cross-modal representation learning for named entity recognition on social media[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2024, 61(1): 103546.
[44] LIU C Y, SUN W B, CHAO W H, et al. Convolution neural network for relation extraction[C]//Advanced Data Mining and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013: 231-242.
[45] NADGERI A, BASTOS A, SINGH K, et al. KGPool: dynamic knowledge graph context selection for relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2021: 535-548.
[46] BASTOS A, NADGERI A, SINGH K, et al. RECON: relation extraction using knowledge graph context in a graph neural network[C]//Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. New York: ACM, 2021: 1673-1685.
[47] HUANG J, ZHU K R, CHANG K C, et al. DEER: descriptive knowledge graph for explaining entity relationships[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2022: 6686-6698.
[48] DU K Z, YANG B, WANG S L, et al. Relation extraction for manufacturing knowledge graphs based on feature fusion of attention mechanism and graph convolution network[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2022, 255: 109703.
[49] CHEN C, WANG T, ZHENG Y, et al. Reinforcement learning-based distant supervision relation extraction for fault diagnosis knowledge graph construction under industry 4.0[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2023, 55: 101900.
[50] FENG S, ZHOU C, LIU Q, et al. Temporal knowledge graph reasoning based on entity relationship similarity perception[J]. Electronics, 2024, 13(12): 2417.
[51] KNEZ T, ?ITNIK S. Multimodal learning for temporal relation extraction in clinical texts[J]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2024, 31(6): 1380-1387.
[52] LIU M F, ZHANG Y K, LI W J, et al. Joint model of entity recognition and relation extraction with self-attention mechanism[J]. ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing, 2020, 19(4): 1-19.
[53] WANG Y J, SUN C Z, WU Y B, et al. ENPAR: enhancing entity and entity pair representations for joint entity relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2021: 2877-2887.
[54] DING K, LIU S, ZHANG Y, et al. A knowledge-enriched and span-based network for joint entity and relation extraction[J]. Computers, Materials and Continua, 2021, 68(1): 377-389.
[55] QIU Q J, MA K, LV H R, et al. Construction and application of a knowledge graph for iron deposits using text mining analytics and a deep learning algorithm[J]. Mathematical Geosciences, 2023, 55(3): 423-456.
[56] ZARATIANA U, TOMEH N, HOLAT P, et al. An autoregressive text-to-graph framework for joint entity and relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. New York: ACM, 2024: 19477-19487.
[57] CAO X, SHAO Q. Joint entity relation extraction based on LSTM via attention mechanism[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2024, 49(3): 4353-4363.
[58] DENG S M, ZHANG N Y, LI L Q, et al. OntoED: low-resource event detection with ontology embedding[C]//Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2021: 2828-2839.
[59] YANG Y B, HU Q R, LIU Y, et al. Power grid monitoring event recognition method integrating knowledge graph and deep learning[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2022, 10: 950954.
[60] HAMILTON W L, YING R, LESKOVEC J, et al. Inductive representation learning on large graphs[C]//Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. New York: ACM, 2017: 1025-1035.
[61] CHANG C, TANG Y, LONG Y X, et al. Multi-information preprocessing event extraction with BiLSTM-CRF attention for academic knowledge graph construction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2023, 10(5): 2713-2724.
[62] HE X Y, TAI P, LU H B, et al. A biomedical event extraction method based on fine-grained and attention mechanism[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2022, 23(1): 308.
[63] LI Z X, JIN X L, LI W, et al. Temporal knowledge graph reasoning based on evolutional representation learning[C]//Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2021: 408-417.
[64] HUANG Y X, YU S H, CHU J J, et al. Combining deep learning with knowledge graph for design knowledge acquisition in conceptual product design[J]. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2024, 138(1): 167-200.
[65] DONG S, TAO X Y, ZHONG R, et al. Advanced mathe-matics exercise recommendation based on automatic knowledge extraction and multilayer knowledge graph[J]. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2023, 17: 776-793.
[66] 张吉祥, 张祥森, 武长旭, 等. 知识图谱构建技术综述[J]. 计算机工程, 2022, 48(3): 23-37.
ZHANG J X, ZHANG X S, WU C X, et al. Survey of knowledge graph construction techniques[J]. Computer Engineering, 2022, 48(3): 23-37.
[67] JIANG C, XUE X S. Matching biomedical ontologies with long short-term memory networks[C]//Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine. Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 2484-2489.
[68] BARLAUG N, GULLA J A. Neural networks for entity matching: a survey[J]. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2021, 15(3): 1-37.
[69] IYER V, AGARWAL A, KUMAR H. VeeAlign: a supervised deep learning approach to ontology alignment[C]//Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Workshop on Ontology Matching, 2020: 216-224.
[70] WANG Z. Contextualized structural self-supervised learning for ontology matching[J]. arXiv:2310.03840, 2023.
[71] HAO J H, LEI C, EFTHYMIOU V, et al. MEDTO: medical data to ontology matching using hybrid graph neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2021: 2946-2954.
[72] HUANG Y T, VAITHEESHWARI R, CHEN M C, et al. MITREtrieval: retrieving MITRE techniques from unstructured threat reports by fusion of deep learning and ontology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2024, 21(4): 4871-4887.
[73] GIRI K S V, DEEPAK G. A semantic ontology infused deep learning model for disaster tweet classification[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83(22): 62257-62285.
[74] ALI KHOUDJA M, FAREH M, BOUARFA H. Deep embedding learning with auto-encoder for large-scale ontology matching[J]. International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems, 2022, 18(1): 1-18.
[75] XUE X S, HUANG Y R, ZHANG Z Q. Deep reinforcement learning based ontology meta-matching technique[J]. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 2023, 106(5): 635-643.
[76] MAO X, WANG W T, XU H M, et al. MRAEA: an efficient and robust entity alignment approach for cross-lingual knowledge graph[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2020: 420-428.
[77] YU C M, WANG F, LIU Y H, et al. Research on knowledge graph alignment model based on deep learning[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 186: 115768.
[78] XIN K X, SUN Z Q, HUA W, et al. Informed multi-context entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2022: 1197-1205.
[79] XU B, HUANG S Z, SHA C F, et al. MAF: a general matching and alignment framework for multimodal named entity recognition[C]//Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2022: 1215-1223.
[80] LI Q, GUO S, LUO Y, et al. Attribute-consistent knowledge graph representation learning for multi-modal entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023. New York: ACM, 2023: 2499-2508.
[81] LIU X Z, WU J Y, LI T Y, et al. Unsupervised entity alignment for temporal knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023. New York: ACM, 2023: 2528-2538.
[82] HE L L, LI H, ZHANG R. A semantic-spatial aware data conflation approach for place knowledge graphs[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2024, 13(4): 106.
[83] LIN Q K, MAO R, LIU J, et al. Fusing topology contexts and logical rules in language models for knowledge graph completion[J]. Information Fusion, 2023, 90: 253-264.
[84] XIONG S H, YANG Y, PAYANI A, et al. TEILP: time prediction over knowledge graphs via logical reasoning[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 38(14): 16112-16119.
[85] WANG P, XIE X, WANG X H, et al. Reasoning through memorization: nearest neighbor knowledge graph embeddings[C]//Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023: 111-122.
[86] LI H T, LIU H R, WANG Y, et al. DegreEmbed: incorporating entity embedding into logic rule learning for knowledge graph reasoning[J]. arXiv:2112.09933, 2021.
[87] 王赫楠, 杨昕悦, 孙艳秋. 知识图谱关系检错和知识补全方法研究[J]. 计算机与数字工程, 2022, 50(7): 1534-1539.
WANG H N, YANG X Y, SUN Y Q. Research on error detection and knowledge completion methods of knowledge map relationship[J]. Computer & Digital Engineering, 2022, 50(7): 1534-1539.
[88] 苏瑜鸿. 知识图谱中的知识推理技术研究[D]. 北京：北京邮电大学, 2023.
SU Y Y. Research on knowledge reasoning techniques for knowledge graphs[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2023.
[89] 张文豪, 徐贞顺, 刘纳, 等. 知识图谱补全方法研究综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2024, 60(12): 61-73.
ZHANG W H, XU Z S, LIU N, et al. Overview of knowledge graph completion methods[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2024, 60(12): 61-73.
[90] HOHENECKER P, LUKASIEWICZ T. Ontology reasoning with deep neural networks[J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2020, 68: 503-540.
[91] JAGVARAL B, LEE W K, ROH J S, et al. Path-based reasoning approach for knowledge graph completion using CNN-BiLSTM with attention mechanism[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 142: 112960.
[92] XIE X, ZHANG N Y, LI Z B, et al. From discrimination to generation: knowledge graph completion with generative transformer[C]//Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022. New York: ACM, 2022: 162-165.
[93] LI Z, WANG C X, WANG X, et al. HJE: joint convolutional representation learning for knowledge hypergraph completion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2024, 36(8): 3879-3892.
[94] CHEN X, ZHANG N Y, LI L, et al. Hybrid transformer with multi-level fusion for multimodal knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2022: 904-915.
[95] ZHENG S F, WANG W Q, QU J F, et al. MMKGR: multi-hop multi-modal knowledge graph reasoning[C]//Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering. Piscataway: IEEE, 2023: 96-109.
[96] JIANG T S, LIU T Y, GE T, et al. Encoding temporal information for time-aware link prediction[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in NaturalLanguage Processing. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2016: 2350-2354.
[97] HE Y Q, ZHANG P, LIU L C, et al. HIP network: historical information passing network for extrapolation reasoning on temporal knowledge graph[C]//Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021: 1915-1921.
[98] ZHANG M Q, XIA Y W, LIU Q, et al. Learning latent relations for temporal knowledge graph reasoning[C]//Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2023: 12617-12631.
[99] ZHANG C X, YAO H X, HUANG C, et al. Few-shot knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 3041-3048.
[100] SHEN Y, DING N, ZHENG H T, et al. Modeling relation paths for knowledge graph completion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2021, 33(11): 3607-3617.
[101] 庞俊, 刘小琪, 谷峪, 等. 基于多粒度注意力网络的知识超图链接预测[J]. 软件学报, 2023, 34(3): 1259-1276.
PANG J, LIU X Q, GU Y, et al. Knowledge hypergraph link prediction based on multi-granular attention network[J]. Journal of Software, 2023, 34(3): 1259-1276.
[102] VASHISHTH S, SANYAL S, NITIN V, et al. InteractE: improving convolution-based knowledge graph embeddings by increasing feature interactions[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 3009-3016.
[103] CHE F H, ZHANG D W, TAO J H, et al. ParamE: regarding neural network parameters as relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 2774-2781.
[104] ZHAO F, LI Y G, HOU J, et al. Improving question answering over incomplete knowledge graphs with relation prediction[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34(8): 6331-6348.
[105] BISWAS R, SACK H, ALAM M. MADLINK: attentive multihop and entity descriptions for link prediction in knowledge graphs[J]. Semantic Web, 2024, 15(1): 83-106.
[106] YANG J L, LU G X, HE S Y, et al. A novel model for relation prediction in knowledge graphs exploiting semantic and structural feature integration[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 12962.
[107] WANG D S, TANG K J, ZENG J, et al. MM-Transformer: a transformer-based knowledge graph link prediction model that fuses multimodal features[J]. Symmetry, 2024, 16(8): 961.
[108] DENG Z Y, WANG W Q, WANG Z W, et al. GOLD: a global and local-aware denoising framework for commonsense knowledge graph noise detection[C]//Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2023: 3591-3608.
[109] TU H L, YU S, SAIKRISHNA V, et al. Deep outdated fact detection in knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. Piscataway: IEEE, 2023: 1443-1452.
[110] LIU X Y, LIU Y, HU W, et al. Knowledge graph error detection with contrastive confidence adaption[C]//Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. New York: ACM, 2024: 8824-8831.
[111] MA J T, ZHOU C Y, WANG Y J, et al. PTrustE: a high-accuracy knowledge graph noise detection method based on path trustworthiness and triple embedding[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2022, 256: 109688.
[112] YANG X H, WANG N. A confidence-aware and path-enhanced convolutional neural network embedding framework on noisy knowledge graph[J]. Neurocomputing, 2023, 545: 126261.
[113] LIU Y Z, ZHANG Q G, DU M N, et al. Error detection on knowledge graphs with triple embedding[C]//Proceedings of the 2023 31st European Signal Processing Conference. Piscataway: IEEE, 2023: 1604-1608.
[114] XUE X Y, ZHANG C X, WANG Y Z, et al. Heterogeneous views and spatial structure enhancement for triple error detection[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 256: 124938.
[115] ZHANG Z, ZHUANG F Z, ZHU H S, et al. Relational graph neural network with hierarchical attention for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 9612-9619.
[116] ZHANG Y Q, ZHOU Z K, YAO Q M, et al. AdaProp: learning adaptive propagation for graph neural network based knowledge graph reasoning[C]//Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2023: 3446-3457.
[117] AN Y, TANG H C, JIN B, et al. KAMPNet: multi-source medical knowledge augmented medication prediction network with multi-level graph contrastive learning[J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2023, 23(1): 243.
[118] HUAI Z P, ZHANG D W, YANG G H, et al. Spatial-temporal knowledge graph network for event prediction[J]. Neurocomputing, 2023, 553: 126557.
[119] LI J, ZHANG W, YU H T. A multi-view filter for relation-free knowledge graph completion[J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 33: 100397.
[120] WEI W X, SONG Y T, YAO B. Enhancing heterogeneous knowledge graph completion with a novel GAT-based approach[J]. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2024, 18(4): 1-20.
[121] CHEN W J, CAO Y X, FENG F L, et al. HoGRN: explainable sparse knowledge graph completion via high-order graph reasoning network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2024, 36(12): 8462-8475.
[122] TERU K K, DENIS E G, HAMILTON W L, et al. Inductive relation prediction by subgraph reasoning[C]//Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning. New York: ACM, 2020: 9448-9457.
[123] ZEB A, SAIF S, CHEN J D, et al. Complex graph convolutional network for link prediction in knowledge graphs[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 200: 116796.
[124] SHANG B, ZHAO Y L, LIU J. Learnable convolutional attention network for knowledge graph completion[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2024, 285: 111360.
[125] LIU X Y, TAN H B, CHEN Q H, et al. RAGAT: relation aware graph attention network for knowledge graph completion[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 20840-20849.
[126] DAI G Q, WANG X Z, ZOU X Y, et al. MRGAT: multi-relational graph attention network for knowledge graph completion[J]. Neural Networks, 2022, 154: 234-245.
[127] SHI J K, LI M, ZHAO J. Knowledge graph link prediction model based on attention graph convolutional network[C]//Advanced Data Mining and Applications. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023: 448-453.
[128] CUI L M, SEO H, TABAR M, et al. DETERRENT: knowledge guided graph attention network for detecting healthcare misinformation[C]//Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2020: 492-502.
[129] KOSASIH E E, MARGAROLI F, GELLI S, et al. Towards knowledge graph reasoning for supply chain risk management using graph neural networks[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2024, 62(15): 5596-5612.
[130] ZHANG Q G, DONG J N, DUAN K Y, et al. Contrastive knowledge graph error detection[C]//Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. New York: ACM, 2022: 2590-2599.
[131] XIE B B, MA X X, WU J, et al. Heterogeneous graph neural network via knowledge relations for fake news detection[C]//Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management. New York: ACM, 2023: 1-11.
[132] WANG S, HUANG X, CHEN C, et al. REFORM[C]//Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. New York: ACM, 2021: 1979-1988.
[133] DONG X R, ZHANG Y J, PANG K, et al. Heterogeneous graph neural networks with denoising for graph embeddings[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2022, 238: 107899.
[134] SUN K, JIANG H J, HU Y L, et al. Incorporating multi-level sampling with adaptive aggregation for inductive knowledge graph completion[J]. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2024, 18(5): 1-16.
[135] PENG C, SHENG Y Y, GUI W H, et al. A rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on multimodal knowledge graph[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2024, 20(11): 13047-13057.
[136] HUANG J, ZHANG T H, ZHU J, et al. A deep embedding model for knowledge graph completion based on attention mechanism[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2021, 33(15): 9751-9760.
[137] ZHOU B, SHEN X W, LU Y Q, et al. Semantic-aware event link reasoning over industrial knowledge graph embedding time series data[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2023, 61(12): 4117-4134.
[138] 李金保. 基于图神经网络的知识图谱推理关键算法研究[D]. 济南: 齐鲁工业大学, 2024.
LI J B. Research on key algorithms for knowledge graph reasoning based on graph neural network[D]. Jinan: Qilu University of Technology, 2024.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

113

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	113

	来源	本网站

	次数	113
	比例	100%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	84

	来源	本网站

	次数	84
	比例	100%