Abstract:

This paper studies knowledge transfer in collaborative innovation of a two-level supply chain composed of a supplier and a manufacturer. It analyzes the effects of decentralized decision-making, centralized decision-making, common revenue sharing decision-making and bargaining decision-making on knowledge transfer decision-making in collaborative innovation of supply chain, and compares the size of relevant variables under four decision-making situations and the change rule under different knowledge absorption capacity. The results show that the revenue sharing contract mechanism can significantly increase the amount of knowledge transfer in collaborative innovation of supply chain, improve the overall profit of supply chain, reduce the retail price and wholesale price of products, and the effect of the revenue sharing contract mechanism under bargaining conditions is more obvious than that of the common revenue sharing contract mechanism. It is found that the revenue sharing contract mechanism can effectively promote collaborative innovation among supply chain enterprises, and the knowledge absorption capacity among supply chain enterprises will also affect the efficiency of collaborative innovation in supply chain.

Key words: collaborative innovation of supply chain, revenue sharing, knowledge transfer, Stackelberg game

摘要：

研究由一个供应商和一个制造商组成的二级供应链协同创新中的知识转移问题，分析了分散决策、集中决策、普通收益共享决策和议价条件下的收益共享决策时四种情形对供应链协同创新中知识转移决策的影响，比较了四种决策情况下的相关变量的大小和在不同知识吸收能力下的变化规律。结果发现：收益共享契约机制可显著提高供应链协同创新中的知识转移数量，有利于提高供应链的整体利润，还有助于降低产品零售价格、批发价格等，并且议价条件下的收益共享契约机制比普通的收益共享契约机制效果更为明显。研究表明收益共享契约机制能够有效地促进供应链企业间的协同创新，同时供应链企业间的知识吸收能力也会影响到供应链协同创新的效率。

关键词: 供应链协同创新, 收益共享, 知识转移, Stackelberg博弈