Computer Engineering and Applications ›› 2009, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (26): 199-203.DOI: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2009.26.060
• 工程与应用 • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Dong-dong1,2,PENG Qi-yuan3
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
陈冬冬1,2,彭其渊3
通讯作者:
Abstract: The forecast is the base of scientific decision-making,how to choose the right forecasting method,is very important for forecasting results.This paper first briefly introduces a group of forecasting methods on popular,then uses the data of total freight in 1978-2006,and using the methods which describe to forecast and determinate the error,and finally gives various methods a simple comments.The conclusion is proved that the complicated method of forecasting is not necessarily better than the simple one once again.The paper has a certain theoretical and practical significance for the further study of combination forecasting methods and laid the foundation for further research.
Key words: forecasting methods, time-series data, total freight, comparative analysis
摘要: 预测是科学决策的基础,如何选择合适的预测方法,对于获得好的预测结果具有重要影响。就现在比较流行的一组预测方法做简单介绍后,利用中国1978年~2006年货运周转量数据,用文中介绍的方法分别做出预测和预测误差测定,并对各种方法给出简单评述,并再次验证了复杂方法预测效果并不一定比简单方法好的结论。具有一定的理论和实践意义,为进一步研究组合预测方法奠定了基础。
关键词: 预测方法, 时间序列数据, 货运周转量, 比较分析
CLC Number:
F272.1
TP18
CHEN Dong-dong1,2,PENG Qi-yuan3. Group of forecasting methods comparative analysis[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2009, 45(26): 199-203.
陈冬冬1,2,彭其渊3. 一组预测方法的比较分析[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2009, 45(26): 199-203.
0 / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://cea.ceaj.org/EN/10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2009.26.060
http://cea.ceaj.org/EN/Y2009/V45/I26/199