基于Agent的改进贴近度的多属性评价模型

doi:10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2006-0203

计算机工程与应用 ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (5): 65-70.DOI: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2006-0203

基于Agent的改进贴近度的多属性评价模型

伍京华，吴学桥

1.中国矿业大学（北京）管理学院，北京 100083
2.北京交通大学经济管理学院，北京 100044

出版日期:2021-03-01 发布日期:2021-03-02

Multi-attribute Evaluation Model Based on Improved Closeness of Agent

WU Jinghua, WU Xueqiao

1.School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology（Beijing）, Beijing 100083, China
2.School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Online:2021-03-01 Published:2021-03-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

商务智能中，基于Agent的自动谈判利用Agent的各项人工智能优势，日益受到重视。针对当前对其中的多属性评价量化研究不够的现状，结合犹豫模糊理论，构建基于多属性的方案；将属性分为等级属性和数量属性，采用语言术语集对等级属性进行区间数转换，并给出将数量属性转换成区间数的方法；综合以上研究，引入总体贡献率，对理想贴近度模型进行改进，提出基于总体贡献率的相对贴近度模型，从而提出基于Agent的改进贴近度的多属性评价模型，并对模型步骤进行了归纳和梳理；以北京市碳排放权交易为背景拟定算例和数据，通过计算和对比分析验证了该模型的合理性和有效性。

关键词: 智能体, 贴近度, 多属性评价, 商务智能, 自动谈判

Abstract:

In business intelligence, automatic negotiation based on Agent has been paid more and more attention due to its advantages of artificial intelligence. Aiming at the lack of quantitative research on multi-attribute evaluation, firstly, combined with hesitant fuzzy theory, a scheme based on multi-attribute is constructed; secondly, the attribute is divided into grade attribute and quantitative attribute, and the interval number conversion of grade attribute is carried out by linguistic term set, and the method of converting quantitative attribute into interval number is given; thirdly, the overall contribution rate is introduced to carry out the ideal closeness degree model in this paper, the relative closeness model based on the overall contribution rate is proposed, and the multi-attribute evaluation model based on the improved closeness degree based on Agent is proposed, then the model steps are summarized and sorted; finally, taking Beijing carbon emission trading as the background, the rationality and effectiveness of the model are verified through calculation and comparative analysis.

Key words: Agent, closeness, multi-attribute evaluation, business intelligence, automatic negotiation

伍京华，吴学桥. 基于Agent的改进贴近度的多属性评价模型[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(5): 65-70.

WU Jinghua, WU Xueqiao. Multi-attribute Evaluation Model Based on Improved Closeness of Agent[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2021, 57(5): 65-70.

[1]	陈世明，林子朋，高彦丽，裴惠琴. 自适应耦合权重下的异质群体一致性研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(4): 231-235.
[2]	王军，曹雷，陈希亮，赖俊，章乐贵. 多智能体博弈强化学习研究综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(21): 1-13.
[3]	李振涛，冯元珍，王正新. 事件触发下多智能体系统固定时间二分一致性[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(21): 80-86.
[4]	况立群，李思远，冯利，韩燮，徐清宇. 深度强化学习算法在智能军事决策中的应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(20): 271-278.
[5]	范建平，贾雪飞，吴美琴. 单值三角Neutrosophic交叉熵的TOPSIS方法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(6): 239-245.
[6]	孙彧，曹雷，陈希亮，徐志雄，赖俊. 多智能体深度强化学习研究综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(5): 13-24.
[7]	宋娟. 考虑融合算法与交叉熵的毕达哥拉斯决策模型[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(5): 74-79.
[8]	茆汉国，张建德. 多智能体系统的非震颤固定时间一致性[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(4): 158-162.
[9]	陈良康，过榴晓，杨永清. 带有智能领导者的网络系统分群投影一致性[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(19): 42-47.
[10]	许元云，何明，刘锦涛，周波，杨铖. 碰撞锥检测改进的多智能体避障算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(18): 63-68.
[11]	王梦娇，尹翔，黄宁馨. 基于迁移学习的多任务分配算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(13): 150-155.
[12]	彭守镇. 基于信息测度的勾股模糊决策模型及其应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2019, 55(19): 185-190.
[13]	王丽丽1，2，刘昕3. 电动网约车充电站布局优化研究#br#[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2019, 55(14): 228-234.
[14]	冯元珍，刘敏. 具有时滞的混合阶多智能体系统的组一致性[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2019, 55(12): 67-71.
[15]	李杨，徐峰，谢光强，黄向龙. 多智能体技术发展及其应用综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2018, 54(9): 13-21.

基于Agent的改进贴近度的多属性评价模型

Multi-attribute Evaluation Model Based on Improved Closeness of Agent

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics