社会网络下考虑信息补全的物流供应商选择研究

doi:10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2307-0345

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在物流供应商选择过程中，针对分布式评价语言环境下专家评价信息不完整问题，提出社会网络下考虑信息补全的群决策方法。考虑专家接受间接信任关系可能性的大小，提出一种新的信任传递模型来完善专家间的信任值；首次拓展Jensen-Shannon散度到分布式评价语言距离度量上，用于衡量专家之间的相似度；基于K-临近算法，设计改进的残缺评价信息补全方法；对专家信息进行集结并构建共识度量与反馈调节机制，得到群决策矩阵，并运用改进的EDAS（evaluation based on distance from average solution，离平均方案（平均解）距离）方法对方案进行排序；通过物流服务供应商综合评估算例验证该群决策方法的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 间接信任接受可能性, 信任传递模型, 信息补全, 分布式语言, Jensen-Shannon散度, 群体决策, 共识

Abstract: In the process of logistics supplier selection, to address the problem of incomplete information of expert evaluation under the environment of distributed evaluation language, this paper proposes a group decision-making method under social network considering information complementation. Firstly, a new trust transfer model is proposed to improve the trust value between experts by considering the size of the possibility of experts accepting indirect trust relationships. Secondly, the Jensen-Shannon scatter is firstly extended to the distance metric of the distributed evaluation language, which is used to measure the similarity between experts. Thirdly, based on the K-approximation algorithm, an improved method of completing the residual evaluation information is designed; and then, the expert information is assembled and the consensus metric and feedback adjustment mechanism are constructed to obtain the group decision-making method under the social network. Information is assembled and consensus measure and feedback adjustment mechanism are constructed to obtain the group decision matrix, and the improved EDAS (evaluation based on distance from average solution) method is applied to rank the solutions. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the group decision-making method is verified by the comprehensive evaluation example of logistics service providers.

Key words: indirect trust acceptance possibility, trust transfer model, information completion, distributed language, Jensen-Shannon divergence, group decision-making, consensus

高建伟, 张梓暄, 王亚平, 黄宁泊, 赵舒通. 社会网络下考虑信息补全的物流供应商选择研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2024, 60(21): 331-338.

GAO Jianwei, ZHANG Zixuan, WANG Yaping, HUANG Ningbo, ZHAO Shutong. Research on Logistics Provider Selection Considering Information Complementation Under Social Networks[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2024, 60(21): 331-338.

参考文献

[1] 王慧闯. 基于模糊多属性群决策的物流供应商选择研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2021.
WANG H C. Research on logistics supplier selection based on fuzzy multi-attribute group decision[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2021.
[2] 谢利娟. F公司的第三方物流供应商评估与选择研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2018.
XIE L J. A research on evaluation and selection of third party logistics suppliers of F company[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2018.
[3] 孙璐. 基于SODM-TOPSIS的物流供应商选择研究[J]. 物流技术, 2013, 32(23): 333-335.
SUN L. Study on logistics supplier selection model based on SODM-TOPSIS[J]. Logistics Technology, 2013, 32(23): 333-335.
[4] SACHDEWA A, KUMAR R, SINGH H, et al. An approach to analyze logistic outsourcing problem in medium-scale organization by CFPR and VIKOR[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2012, 23(7): 885-898.
[5] 曾守桢, 潘燕. 基于模糊后悔理论-TODIM组合方法的众包物流平台服务质量评价研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(3): 629-650.
ZENG S Z, PAN Y. A fuzzy regret theory-TODIM integrated method for service quality evaluation of crowdsourcing Logistics platform[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical, 2023, 43(3): 629-650.
[6] FRIEDKIN N E, JOHNSEN E C. Social influence and opinions[J]. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2010, 15(3/4): 193-206.
[7] DONG Y, ZHAN M, KOU G, et al. A survey on the-fusion process in opinion dynamics[J]. Information Fusion, 2018(43): 57-65.
[8] LABELLA ??, LIU Y, RODRI?GUEZ R M, et al. Analyzing the performance of classical consensus models in large scale group decision making: a comparative study[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2018, 67: 677-690.
[9] WU J, XIONG R Y, CHICLANA F. Uniform trust propagation and aggregation methods for group decision making in social network with four tuple information[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 96: 29-39.
[10] 曾守桢, 胡英杰. 基于高度残缺信息的分布式语言信任网络群决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(6): 1907-1919.
ZENG S Z, HU Y J. Group decision making method for distributed linguistic trust network based on highly incomplete information[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(6): 1907-1919.
[11] WU J, CHICLANA F, HERRERA-VIEDMA E. Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2015, 35: 827-839.
[12] TIAN Z P, NIE R X, WANG J Q, et al. A two-fold feedback mechanism to support consensus reaching in social network group decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 162: 74-91.
[13] 陈文俊, 倪静. 社会网络环境下基于信任传递的推荐模型研究[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2020, 37(5): 1364-1367.
CHEN W J, NI J. Research on recommendation model based on trust transitivity in social network environment[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2020, 37(5): 1364-1367.
[14] WU J, CHANG J L, CAO Q W, et al. A trust propagation and collaborative filtering based method for incomplete information in social network group decision making with type-2 linguistic trust[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019, 127: 853-864.
[15] 向南, 豆亚杰, 姜江, 等. 基于专家信任网络的不完全信息武器选择决策[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(3): 759-770.
XIANG N, DOU Y J, JIANG J, et al. Weapon selection decision-making based on expert trust network under incomplete information[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2021, 41(3): 759-770.
[16] XU Y J, LI C Y, WEN X W. Missing values estimation and consensus building for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations with multiplicative consistency[J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2018, 11(1): 101-119.
[17] WU X, LIAO H. A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 272(3): 1017-1027.
[18] WU J, DAI L F, CHICLANA F, et al. A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust[J]. Information Fusion, 2017, 41: 232-242.
[19] LIN J. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory/Professional Technical Group on Information Theory, 1991, 37(1): 145-151.
[20] ADAMIC L A, ADAR E. Friends and neighbors on the web[J]. Social Networks, 2003, 25(3): 211-230.
[21] XIAO F. Multi-sensor data fusion based on the belief divergence measure of evidences and the belief entropy[J]. Information Fusion, 2018, 46: 23-32.
[22] URE?A R, CHICLANA F, MELANCON G, et al. A social network based approach for consensus achievement in multi person decision making[J]. Information Fusion, 2019, 47: 72-87.
[23] YAGER R R. Induced aggregation operators[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003, 137(1): 59-69.
[24] XU Y J, CABRERIZO F J, HERRERA-VIEDMA E. A consensus model for hesitant fuzzy preference relations and its application in water allocation management[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 58: 265-284.
[25] KESHAVARZ G M, ZAVADSKAS E K. Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution[J]. Informatica, 2015, 26(3): 435-451.
[26] 曹清玮, 戴丽芳, 孙琪，等. 社会网络环境下基于分布式信任的在线评价方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2020, 35(7): 1697-1702.
CAO Q Y, DAI L F, SUN Q, et al. A distributed trust based online evaluation under social network[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(7): 1697-1702.