装备系统可修部件闭环保障系统绩效研究

计算机工程与应用 ›› 2014, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (18): 54-58.

装备系统可修部件闭环保障系统绩效研究

赵丹1，刘名武2，彭冠军3

1.西南民族大学，成都 610041
2.重庆交通大学管理学院，重庆 400074
3.空军后勤部直属供应部审计处，北京 100035

出版日期:2014-09-15 发布日期:2014-09-12

Performances of repairable parts closed-loop support system for equipment systems

ZHAO Dan1, LIU Mingwu2, PENG Guanjun3

1.Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041, China
2.School of Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
3.Auditing Department of Supply Ministry Directly under Air Force Logistics Department, Beijing 100035, China

Online:2014-09-15 Published:2014-09-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于绩效的后勤保障（PBL）正成为军事装备系统一种主导型保障战略。构建一个由备件仓库和部件修理车间组成的装备系统可修部件闭环保障系统。推导出备件库存水平状态稳态概率分布，获得如可用度等几个重要的保障绩效度量指标。采用数值仿真技术考察系统参数在平时与战时环境下对保障绩效的影响。结果表明，初始备件库存水平对系统可用度影响较小且随着故障强度的增加影响程度减弱，而修复能力对系统可用度影响显著。

关键词: 可修部件, 绩效, 备件库存, 修复强度, 稳态概率分布

Abstract: Performance-Based Logistics（PBL） is becoming a dominant support strategy for military equipment systems. This paper sets up a closed-loop support system which consists of a spare parts warehouse and a repair workshop. The steady-state probability distribution of spare part inventory level is derived and furthermore several important performance measures such as availability are obtained. The effects of system parameters on support performances under peace or war environments are considered by numerical analysis. The results show that the base spare parts inventory level has little effect on the system availability and the degree of effect is decreasing as the failure intensity increases. But, the repair intensity has obvious effect on the system availability.

Key words: repairable parts, performance, spare inventory, repair intensity, steady-state probability distribution

赵丹1，刘名武2，彭冠军3. 装备系统可修部件闭环保障系统绩效研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2014, 50(18): 54-58.

ZHAO Dan1, LIU Mingwu2, PENG Guanjun3. Performances of repairable parts closed-loop support system for equipment systems[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2014, 50(18): 54-58.

[1]	纪蕾1，郭树荣2，丛旭辉3，刘彩霞1. 基于OWA算子和可拓云模型的PPP项目绩效评价——以经营性PPP项目为研究对象[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2018, 54(16): 220-226.
[2]	范建平，赵园园，吴美琴. 基于决策单元异质性的群组交叉效率评价方法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2017, 53(16): 241-248.
[3]	陈友玲，朱颖，谢淑红. 现代制造单元员工知识能力模型及实证研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2016, 52(8): 243-249.
[4]	王敬丰. C-POWGA算子及其在不确定多属性决策中的应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2015, 51(9): 57-61.
[5]	刘名武1，2，万谧宇1，彭冠军3. 绩效保障模式下的装备可修部件售后保障策略[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2015, 51(17): 245-249.
[6]	田帅辉，王旭，常兰. 物流资源整合系统的两阶段利益分配策略研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2014, 50(3): 265-270.
[7]	王旭1，景熠2，李文川2. 纵向研发合作的研发绩效和成本分担机制[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2012, 48(3): 234-236.
[8]	程艳¹，许维胜²，何一文². 虚拟学习社区的绩效评估模型[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2011, 47(4): 17-21.
[9]	张晓燕，薛红军，张玉刚. 触点运动与交互界面按钮设计研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2011, 47(36): 83-85.
[10]	倪霖1，王伟鑫2. 基于灰色AHP的物流服务供应链绩效评价研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2011, 47(32): 236-238.
[11]	徐荣龙，刘正捷，张宁. 手持设备三维菜单绩效评估[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2010, 46(22): 20-22.
[12]	陈冬冬. 一种有效的供应链绩效预测方法及其应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2010, 46(21): 235-237.
[13]	李艳^1，2. GA和SVM在供应链绩效评价中的应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2010, 46(1): 246-248.
[14]	史成东^1,2. 集成供应链管理的多目标规划研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2009, 45(9): 33-36.
[15]	陈冬冬. 一种供应链绩效评价新方法及其应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2009, 45(31): 200-202.