模糊闭环供应链的定价与销售努力决策

计算机工程与应用 ›› 2011, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (36): 21-24.

模糊闭环供应链的定价与销售努力决策

宋庆凤1，赵静2

1.天津大学系统工程研究所，天津 300072
2.天津工业大学理学院，天津 300160

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-12-21 发布日期:2011-12-21

Decisions of pricing and selling effort for fuzzy closed-loop supply chains

SONG Qingfeng1，ZHAO Jing2

1.Institute of Systems Engineering，Tianjin University，Tianjin 300072，China
2.School of Science，Tianjin Polytechnic University，Tianjin 300160，China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-12-21 Published:2011-12-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从期望利润最大化的角度研究了单周期两级模糊闭环供应链的定价与销售努力最优决策问题。分析了包含一个制造商和一个零售商的闭环供应链中的模糊不确定性及需求依赖于零售价格和零售商销售努力的性质，分别建立了集中式决策模型和零售商主导的Stackelberg 博弈模型并进行了求解。数值算例验证了模型的有效性，结论表明：考虑销售努力时产品的最优零售价格、批发价格分别高于不考虑销售努力情形下的相应价格;考虑销售努力时零售商和系统的最大期望利润分别大于不考虑销售努力情形下的最大期望利润。

关键词: 闭环供应链, 销售努力, 模糊变量

Abstract: This paper discusses on the optimal decision problems of pricing and selling effort for a fuzzy two-echelon supply chain with one period，from the perspective of maximization of the expected profit.A centralized decision model and a retailer Stackelberg game model are built by analyzing the fuzzy uncertainty and the property that the demand has relationship with retail price and selling effort of the closed-loop supply chain with one manufacturer and one retailer，and the corresponding optimal strategies of two participants are obtained.One numerical example is presented，which illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed model.The results illustrate that the optimal retail price and wholesale price in the case of considering selling effort are respectively larger than those in the case of no selling effort，moreover，the optimally expected profits of both the retailer and the system in the case of considering selling effort are respectively larger than those in the case of no selling effort.

Key words: closed-loop supply chain, selling effort, fuzzy variable

宋庆凤1，赵静2. 模糊闭环供应链的定价与销售努力决策[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2011, 47(36): 21-24.

SONG Qingfeng1，ZHAO Jing2. Decisions of pricing and selling effort for fuzzy closed-loop supply chains[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2011, 47(36): 21-24.

[1]	陈勇，杨雅斌. 区间规划下的高残值易逝品供应链网络设计[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(6): 254-261.
[2]	张克勇，李春霞，姚建明. 考虑碳限额与销售努力的低碳供应链融资决策[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(22): 256-263.
[3]	孙金岭，袁朋朋，孔盼盼. 考虑处理基金和回收品质量的闭环供应链决策[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(15): 259-267.
[4]	韩梅1，2，康凯1. 回收数量不确定的双重竞争闭环供应链定价研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2019, 55(12): 230-236.
[5]	史成东1，郭福利2，闫秀霞1，马冠英1，李强1. loss-averse测度的低碳闭环供应链最优减排研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2018, 54(4): 256-262.
[6]	李辉，汪传旭. 带碳排放约束的闭环供应链企业合作减排决策[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2018, 54(12): 226-234.
[7]	邵良杉1，李永利1，赵琳琳1，温廷新2，孔祥博2. 矿山产能分配的变量模糊线性规划模型[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2016, 52(20): 227-230.
[8]	曾三云1，龙君2. 给出属性优先序的模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2016, 52(2): 28-30.
[9]	桑圣举. 模糊需求下的闭环供应链协调机制研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2012, 48(17): 36-40.
[10]	钟波，冯秀伟. 一般并联系统Posbist模糊不可靠性分析[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2012, 48(16): 37-40.
[11]	徐志敏. 具有模糊资金需求的银行卡网络决策模型[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2010, 46(16): 241-244.
[12]	史成东^1,2. 收益共享控制下闭环供应链系统稳定性研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2009, 45(12): 27-29.
[13]	宁玉富^1,2,唐万生¹,严维真¹. 商业银行贷款组合优化决策的机会准则模型[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2008, 44(21): 235-237.
[14]	王小斌,矫立峰,孙延明,钱建磊. 基于模糊模拟的主观信任评价模型研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2008, 44(16): 102-104.
[15]	王小斌^1,2,唐万生¹. 具有不确定次品率的EPQ模型及其求解算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2007, 43(35): 105-107.