计算机工程与应用 ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (14): 322-331.DOI: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2410-0284

• 工程与应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑主播营销努力的双渠道供应链定价与协调研究

陈玉玉,袁媛,柏庆国,王要玉,曹旭平   

  1. 1.常熟理工学院 商学院,江苏 苏州 215506
    2.新加坡南洋理工大学 土木与环境工程学院,新加坡 639798
    3.曲阜师范大学 管理学院,山东 日照 276826
    4.苏州大学 东吴商学院,江苏 苏州 215031
  • 出版日期:2025-07-15 发布日期:2025-07-15

Pricing and Coordination of Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Anchor Marketing Efforts

CHEN Yuyu, YUAN Yuan, BAI Qingguo, WANG Yaoyu, CAO Xuping   

  1. 1.School of Business, Changshu Institute of Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215506, China
    2.School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
    3.School of Management, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, Shandong 276826, China
    4.Dongwu Business School, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215031, China
  • Online:2025-07-15 Published:2025-07-15

摘要: 随着网络信息技术和电子商务的普及与发展,企业纷纷开辟网络直销渠道,并引入主播进行平台直播。为研究主播营销努力对双渠道供应链定价、市场需求和利润的影响,并探究考虑直播营销时供应链契约协调效果,构建了主播营销努力的双渠道供应链博弈模型,求解主播营销努力引入前后双渠道供应链最优决策并对其进行比较,此外分别利用批发价格契约和两部收费制契约进行供应链协调。研究发现,与不考虑主播营销努力相比,考虑主播营销努力虽然需要前期投资成本,但可以实现供应链最终利润的提高。因此对于企业而言,在可承受的范围内考虑主播营销努力有利于实现利润增长。在契约协调方面,批发价格契约不能实现供应链协调,而两部收费制契约通过调整固定费用的范围,可以实现供应链协调,实现供应链成员共赢。因此,与供应链成员保持紧密合作有利于实现供应链协调及“双赢”,缓解双重边际化效应。

关键词: 双渠道供应链, 定价协调, 博弈论, 主播营销努力

Abstract: With the popularization and development of network information technology and e-commerce, enterprises have opened up online direct sales channels and introduced live streamers for platform broadcasting. To investigate the impact of anchor marketing efforts on dual channel supply chain pricing, market demand, and profits, and to explore the coordination effect of supply chain contracts when considering live streaming marketing, the paper constructs a dual channel supply chain game model for anchor marketing efforts, solves the optimal decisions of the dual channel supply chain with and without anchor marketing efforts, and compares them. In addition, wholesale price contract and two-part tariff contract are used to coordinate the supply chain. Research has found that, compared with not considering the anchor’s marketing efforts, considering such efforts can increase the supply chain’s final profit although it requires initial investment costs. Therefore, for enterprises, considering anchor marketing efforts within an affordable range is beneficial for achieving profit growth. In terms of contract coordination, a wholesale price contract cannot achieve supply chain coordination, while a two-part tariff contract can achieve supply chain coordination and win-win outcomes for supply chain members by adjusting the scope of fixed fees. Therefore, maintaining close cooperation with supply chain members is beneficial for achieving “win-win” supply chain coordination and alleviating the double marginalization effect.

Key words: dual-channel supply chain, pricing coordination, game theory, anchor marketing effort