风险规避的冷链物流服务供应链减排协调决策

doi:10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2108-0186

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在碳限额交易的背景下，针对由物流服务集成商和冷链物流服务供应商组成的冷链物流服务供应链，考虑集成商或供应商具有风险规避倾向，运用Stackelberg博弈法，探究了集成商和供应商风险规避倾向对冷链物流服务供应链减排与协调决策的影响，并基于Rubinstein讨价还价模型，设计了利润共享契约，以实现供应链的协调。研究表明：集成商风险规避倾向会降低自身的议价能力，不利于自身的发展，但有利于供应商开展减排行动和提高冷链服务水平；集成商风险规避倾向会降低自身议价能力，同时也不利于自身开展减排行动和提高冷链服务水平；集成商和供应商风险规避倾向均会降低自身的效用，提高对方企业的效用；契约模型下，集成商和供应商风险规避倾向能提高自身在供应链内部的竞争力，降低对方企业的竞争力。

关键词: 风险规避, 冷链物流服务供应链, Stackelberg博弈法, 利润共享契约

Abstract:

In the context of carbon cap-and-trade, for the cold chain logistics service supply chain composed of a logistics service integrator and a cold chain logistics service provider, the paper uses the Stackelberg game method, based on the consideration that the integrator or provider has risk-averse tendencies, to explore the influence of risk-averse tendencies of integrator and provider on the decision of cold chain logistics service supply chain reduction and coordination, and based on the Rubinstein bargaining model, a profit-sharing contract is designed to achieve supply chain coordination. Studies show that the risk aversion tendency of integrators will reduce their bargaining power, which is not conducive to their own development, but it is conducive to providers to carry out emission reduction actions and improve cold chain service levels. The risk aversion tendency of integrators will reduce their bargaining power, and it is also not conducive to their own emission reduction actions and improvement of cold chain service levels. The tendency of both integrator and providers to be risk-averse reduces their own utility and increases the utility of the other firm. Under the contract model, the risk-averse tendency of integrator and providers can improve their own competitiveness within the supply chain and reduce the competitiveness of the other firm within the supply chain.

Key words: risk-averse, cold chain logistics service supply chain, Stackelberg game, profit sharing contract

张芳，武杰，杨悦. 风险规避的冷链物流服务供应链减排协调决策[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(24): 259-267.

ZHANG Fang, WU Jie, YANG Yue. Emission Reduction and Coordination Decision in Cold Chain Logistics Service Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2021, 57(24): 259-267.

参考文献

[1] IPCC.Climate change 2014 synthesis report[R].Geneva：Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change，2014.
[2] BENJAAFAR S，LI Y Z，DASKIN M.Carbon footprint and the management of supply chain：insights simple models[J].IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering，2013，10（1）：99-116.
[3] GHOSH G，SHAH J.Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract[J].International Journal of Production Economics，2015，164：319-329.
[4] 刘名武，万谧宇，付红.碳交易和低碳偏好下供应链低碳技术选择研究[J].中国管理科学，2018，26（1）：152-162.
LIU M W，WANG M Y，FU H.Low-carbon technology selection for supply chain under cap and trade mechanism with low-carbon preference[J].Chinese Journal of Management Science，2018，26（1）：152-162.
[5] DU S F，TANG W Z，SONG M L.Low-carbon production with low-carbon premium in cap-and-trade regulation[J].Journal of Cleaner Production，2016，134：652-662.
[6] 赵黎明，孙健慧，张海波.基于微分对策的低碳产品供应链营销合作协调机制[J].管理工程学报，2018，32（3）：105-111.
ZHAO L M，SUN J H，ZHANG H B.Coordination mechanism of marketing cooperation in low-carbon product supply chain based on differential game[J].Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management，2018，32（3）：105-111.
[7] J?RGENSEN S，SIGURE S P，ZACCOUR G.Dynamic cooperative advertising in a channel[J].Journal of Retailing，2000，76（1）：71-92.
[8] ZHOU Y，BAO M，CHEN X，et al.Co-op advertising and emission reduction cost sharing contracts and coordination in low-carbon supply chain based on fairness concerns[J].Journal of Cleaner Production，2016，133：402-413.
[9] TOPTAL A，CENTINKAYA B.How supply chain coordination affects the environment：a carbon footprint perspective[J].Annals of Operations Research，2017，250（2）：487-519.
[10] 王道平，王婷婷.政府补贴下供应链合作减排与促销的动态优化[J].系统管理学报，2021，30（1）：14-27.
WANG D P，WANG T T.Dynamic optimization of cooperation on carbon emission reduction and promotion in supply chain under government subsidy[J].Journal of Systems & Management，2021，30（1）：14-27.
[11] CAO K，XU X，WU Q，et al.Optimal production and carbon emission reduction level under cap-and-trade and low carbon subsidy policies[J].Journal of Cleaner Production，2017，167：505-513.
[12] YAN B，JIN Z J，LIU Y P，et al.Decision on risk-averse dual-channel supply chain under demand disruption[J].Communication in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation，2018，55（2）：206-224.
[13] 申成然，刘小媛.考虑风险规避与碳减排的双渠道供应链决策[J].计算机工程与应用，2019，55（1）：241-247.
SHEN C R，LIU X Y.Decision of dual-channel supply chain when considering risk aversion and carbon emission reduction[J].Computer Engineering and Applications，2019，55（1）：241-247.
[14] ZHAO S L，ZHOU Q H.A risk-averse marketing strategy and its effect on coordination activities in a remanufacturing supply chain under market fluctuation[J].Journal of Cleaner Production，2018，171（1）：1290-1299.
[15] CHEN X，HAO G，LI L.Channel coordination with a loss-averse retailer and option contracts[J].International Journal of Operational Economics，2014，150：52-57.
[16] 张克勇，李春霞，姚建明.考虑碳限额与销售努力的低碳供应链融资决策[J].计算机工程与应用，2020，56（22）：256-263.
ZHANG K Y，LI C X，YAO J M.Financing decision of low carbon supply chain considering carbon limit and sales effort[J].Computer Engineering and Applications，2020，56（22）：256-263.
[17] CUI D.Regional logistics network design of balanced traffic congestion and low-carbon economy[D].Beijing：North China Electric Power University（Beijing），2018.
[18] IBANEZ L，GROLLEAU G.Can ecolabeling schemes preserve the environment?[J].Environment and Resource Economics，2008，40（2）：233-249.
[19] GHOSH G，SHAH J.Comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures[J].International Journal of Production Economics，2011，135（2）：568-583.
[20] XIA L J，GOU T T，QIN J J，et al.Carbon emission reduction and pricing policies of a supply chain considering reciprocal preferences in cap-and-trade system[J].Annals of Operation Research，2018，268（1/2）：149-175.
[21] 梁喜，张余婷.基于消费者偏好的低碳双渠道供应链定价与减排策略[J].运筹与管理，2020，29（12）：107-117.
LIANG X，ZHANG Y T.Dual-channel supply chain pricing decision and emission reduction policies based on consumer preference to low carbon[J].Operations Research and Management Science，2020，29（12）：107-117.
[22] XIAO T，CHOI T M.Purchasing choices and channel structure strategies for a two-echelon system with risk-averse players[J].International Journal of Production Economics，2009，120（1）：54-65.
[23] CHOI T M，LI D，YAN H.Mean-variance analysis of a single supplier and retailer supply chain under a return policy[J].European Journal of Operational Research，2008，184（1）：356-376.
[24] RUBINSREIN A.Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining mode[J].Economertrica，1982，50（1）：97-109.
[25] 王芹鹏，赵道致.两级供应链减排与促销的合作策略[J].控制与决策，2014，29（2）：307-314.
WANG Q P，ZHAO D Z.Cooperative strategy of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a two-echelon supply chain[J].Control and Decision，2014，29（2）：307-314.