Performance analysis of MPTCP and CMT-SCTP multi-path transport protocols

Computer Engineering and Applications ›› 2013, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (21): 79-82.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Performance analysis of MPTCP and CMT-SCTP multi-path transport protocols

FU Fa1, ZHOU Xing1, YANG Xiong1, Hakim Adhari2, Erwin P.Rathgeb2

1.College of Information Science and Technology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
2.Institute for Experimental Mathematics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45326, Germany

Online:2013-11-01 Published:2013-10-30

MPTCP与CMT-SCTP多路径传输协议性能分析

符发1，周星1，杨雄1，Hakim Adhari2，Erwin P.Rathgeb2

1.海南大学信息科学技术学院，海口 570228
2.杜伊斯堡-埃森大学实验数学学院，德国埃森 45326

Abstract

Abstract: Achieving multipath transport by terminal’s multi-homed characteristics is a hot topic of Internet protocol application. MPTCP and CMT-SCTP are both more mature and key protocols for multipath transmission, but there is still a lot of performance analysis needed before large-scale application. This paper presents the behaviors of MPTCP and CMT-SCTP multipath transmission and compares the difference between both protocols on the local test-bed environment. Results show that both MPTCP and CMT-SCTP protocols can significantly increase throughput. Meanwhile the scheduling strategy for transmission is still not perfect and needs further improvement.

Key words: multipath transmission, load-sharing, path management, congestion control, buffer, performance analysis

摘要： 利用终端的多宿主特性实现多路径传输是因特网协议的一个热点研究问题，MPTCP和CMT-SCTP是目前比较成熟而关键的两个多路径传输协议，但在大规模应用前还需要作大量的性能测试分析研究。在本地测试床环境中，对MPTCP和CMT-SCTP多路径传输实际吞吐量的性能进行对比测试与分析。结果表明MPTCP和CMT-SCTP都能获得吞吐量的提高，但传输调度算法仍然不完善，需要进一步改进。

关键词: 多路径传输, 负载共享, 路径管理, 拥塞控制, 缓存, 性能分析

FU Fa1, ZHOU Xing1, YANG Xiong1, Hakim Adhari2, Erwin P.Rathgeb2. Performance analysis of MPTCP and CMT-SCTP multi-path transport protocols[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2013, 49(21): 79-82.

符发1，周星1，杨雄1，Hakim Adhari2，Erwin P.Rathgeb2. MPTCP与CMT-SCTP多路径传输协议性能分析[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2013, 49(21): 79-82.

[1]	QIN Qin, LIANG Chengji. Optimization of Equipment Coordination Scheduling with Considering Buffer Space in Automated Container Terminal [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2020, 56(6): 262-270.
[2]	XU Guoyu, XU Gang, JIANG Tao, HU Haitao. Research on Quantitative Analysis of Authentication Mechanism Performance for Space-Ground Integrated Information Network [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2020, 56(21): 108-114.
[3]	WANG Yaming, TANG Junyong, LEI Juchao. Wireless Network Congestion Algorithm for Noise Packet Loss Sensing [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2020, 56(14): 93-97.
[4]	SHI Hui, CAI Yueming, YANG Weiwei, XIANG Zhongwu, CHEN Dechuan. Secure Performance Analysis on Untrusted Relay Network with TSR over Nakagami-[m] Channel [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2020, 56(12): 98-104.
[5]	WEN Jiaxian, WEI Chen, YIN Yuqi, HU Zhihua. Integrated Scheduling of ASC and AGV Considering Block Buffer Capacity [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2020, 56(11): 238-245.
[6]	LIANG Chengji, LIU Yongqiang. Joint Dispatch of Container Terminal AGV and Yard Crane with Buffer Area [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2019, 55(24): 247-253.
[7]	ZHU Danhong, LIN Qingxiang, ZHANG Dong. Deadline-aware of congestion control algorithm based on SDN data center network [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2018, 54(3): 68-73.
[8]	SUI Nannan1, WANG Cong1, ZHANG Dongmei1, ZHOU Xin2, XU Youyun1，3. CMT-SC：Packet loss detection scheme for CMT in heterogeneous wireless environment [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2018, 54(3): 94-99.
[9]	LOU Gaoxiang, CAI Zongyan, LIU Qingtao. Application of new hybrid algorithm in mixed model assembly scheduling [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2018, 54(16): 254-259.
[10]	JIANG Jieqi, YANG Geng, LI Peng. Analysis of users’ behavior under cloud computing environment [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2018, 54(14): 127-132.
[11]	QIN Qiuyu1, LIU Dandan2, ZHANG Jian2. Adaptive congestion control mechanism for delay tolerant networks [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2018, 54(11): 109-115.
[12]	WANG Wenjing1，2, LUO Jiangtao1，2. Active congestion control strategy in named data networking [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2018, 54(10): 115-120.
[13]	CUI Jiaqi, YANG Jianfeng, XU Jun, GUO Chengcheng. CSMA/CA performance analysis in hybrid CSMA/CA and TDMA networks [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2017, 53(20): 83-88.
[14]	WANG Renqun, PENG Li. Topology-aware energy consumption optimization in data center networks [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2017, 53(17): 117-122.
[15]	YANG Nan1, CHEN Yuanbo2, WANG Yanjie2, LI Qing2. Multipath transmission protocol based on degree-constrained shortest path tree [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2017, 53(11): 126-130.

Performance analysis of MPTCP and CMT-SCTP multi-path transport protocols

MPTCP与CMT-SCTP多路径传输协议性能分析

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics